Bridge power for projects that can’t wait.
Turnkey, relocatable on-site power from 5 to 60 MW, for anticipated terms of 1 to 7 years. Find the situation closest to yours.
Get My Power PlanConstruction and commissioning
- The constraint
- The building, the electrical rooms, and the mechanical plant are finished, but integrated systems testing needs real load and the utility service is not yet energized.
- The proposed approach
- BridgePower proposes on-site generation sized to the commissioning load, so testing and handover can advance while permanent utility capacity remains unavailable.
Technical considerations
- Load profile across commissioning phases
- Tie-in point to the facility’s medium-voltage system
- Step-load behavior during testing
- Transition plan to permanent service
Delayed utility connections
- The constraint
- The interconnection date has moved, or the substation and transmission upgrades behind it will take longer than the facility schedule allows.
- The proposed approach
- A bridge-power installation carries the facility from readiness to grid energization, with a term matched to the utility’s revised schedule and a removal plan agreed at the start.
Technical considerations
- Expected interconnection date and its uncertainty
- Continuous-duty operation and maintenance strategy
- Fuel supply capacity at the site
- Air permitting pathway for the jurisdiction
New data center campuses
- The constraint
- A greenfield campus can be ready for its first building years before the full utility build-out reaches the site.
- The proposed approach
- BridgePower designs the first block of on-site power around the initial halls, with the site layout, fuel supply, and electrical design planned for the capacity the campus will need next.
Technical considerations
- Land and access for the generation yard
- Gas utility capacity and pressure
- Electrical one-line across campus phases
- Noise and setback requirements
AI and GPU capacity expansion
- The constraint
- Compute-dense deployments raise a site’s power requirement faster than the utility can add capacity, leaving finished space that cannot be energized.
- The proposed approach
- On-site generation supplies the additional load behind the meter while grid capacity catches up, engineered around the electrical behavior of the compute it serves.
Technical considerations
- Rapid load changes from compute workloads
- Coordination with UPS and facility protection
- Redundancy aligned to agreed continuity requirements
- Operation alongside existing utility service, where permitted
Phased power delivery
- The constraint
- Demand arrives in stages. Committing to the full capacity on day one ties up capital and site area before it is needed.
- The proposed approach
- Modular generation can be planned in blocks, adding capacity as halls come online and reducing it as permanent power arrives, where the original design allows.
Technical considerations
- Block sizes and energization sequence
- Fuel and electrical infrastructure sized for later phases
- Permitting scope across phases
- Equipment availability for each addition
Temporary on-site generation for critical operations
- The constraint
- An operating facility needs additional or alternative power for a defined period, during utility work, capacity constraints, or a planned transition.
- The proposed approach
- BridgePower evaluates the complete system for the period in question, including redundancy, protection, fuel reliability, monitoring, and service coverage, and documents each commitment in the agreement.
Technical considerations
- Firm deliverable capacity versus installed capacity
- Maintenance windows and spare equipment
- Monitoring, alarms, and escalation
- Incident-response responsibilities
Stop waiting for power.
Start planning for it.
Tell us where, when, and how much power you need. Start with a short project inquiry.